Just got done reading this piece (thanks to Bookslut for the link) by an undergrad lit major at my alma mater — Columbia Spectator - Real Life and the Life of the Lit Major — who concluded that it was OK with him if most people didn’t read the books he liked because that kept those books important, special, “academic,” “literary” — as opposed to “popular” or “for the masses” (quotes indicate the words that are his). I have another word for him:
Elitist.
What if I told him that many who read Dostoevsky are homeless and not graduate comparative literature students? Would that shoot a hole in his theory that “In fact, given the increasing divide between “popular fiction” and “literary fiction,” quality really doesn’t translate to popularity. I think it would be hard to claim that Harry Potter, for example, is a masterpiece of world literature. That doesn’t mean it’s “bad,” of course. It does, however, translate into a divide between what scholars of literature focus on and what a Barnes and Noble browser picks up.”
Hmmmm. What about the fact that Oprah had thousands, perhaps millions reading Anna Karenina? Or that many of us with doctorates (even from your fine institution, sir) browse at Barnes and Noble? I think we need to be careful with these quick distinctions between scholars of literature and everyone else; some of the deepest readers I have ever met have engaged with texts from positions in the world far outside academic circles — homeless, marginally employed, no college degree, no high school one either.
The best thing about literature is that it doesn’t belong to anyone. It isn’t necessarily academic and it *doesn’t* take a college degree to interpret or read. The kind of mind frame you write about only keeps potential fans of Tolstoy or O’Connor farther away from these stories because someone, somewhere told them, “These books are hard” and that translated into “These books are too hard for you.” You know what? That’s crap.
You ask two key questions as toss-off asides in the middle of your column: “What makes reading necessary to life? Is it relevant at all?” I am spending my career answering these questions, but as far as literature is concerned, I can tell you that you don’t need that degree to read it. You only need your heart and your mind.
Sorry to burst your bubble, my friend.